Search for: "U.S. v. Angel"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 1:50 am
The case is titled United Fabrics International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:51 am
<> Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
NLRB(2002) 535 U.S. 137.) [read post]
EFF, ACLU Urge Appeals Court to Revive Challenge to Los Angeles’ Collection of Scooter Location Data
23 Jul 2021, 2:48 pm
” For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/sanchez-v-ladot-opening-appellage-briefpdf Contact: JenniferLynchSurveillance Litigation Directorjlynch@eff.org [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
New York-based theater ensemble Elevator Repair Service (ERS) returns to Los Angeles’ REDCAT next week with Arguendo, an absurdist look at a 1991 U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:42 am
County of Los Angeles and Trina Ray et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
In a complaint filed in the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:45 am
District Court Judge Stephen V. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
As reported by the Los Angeles Times, the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday heard oral arguments in Bishop v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:18 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
The Supreme Court in 2000's U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:57 am
Bloomberg reports that a Los Angeles jury has awarded $13.8 million in punitive damages in the retrial of Bullock v. [read post]
Italian Echo Film Sues DigiWorld, Cinemavault.com, and Monarch Home Video For Copyright Infringement
8 Mar 2009, 12:40 am
" The case is titled Echo film S.r.l. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:46 am
City of Los Angeles, 420 F.3d 981 (9th Cir.2005) (Pregerson, J.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1176, 126 S.Ct. 1344, 164 L.Ed.2d 58 (2006). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:12 pm
He overstays his visa, finds love, and marries his wife in Los Angeles in 2000. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
Los Angeles, LLC, ___ Cal. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:20 am
In the published opinion in Chaudhry v. [read post]
