Search for: "U.S. v. Diaz*" Results 261 - 280 of 626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Brian Shiffrin
This year, in Bullcoming v New Mexico (564 U.S. __,131 S.Ct. 2705 [2011]), the Court held that under the confrontation clause “the accused’s right is to be confronted with the analyst who made the certification, unless that analyst is unavailable at trial, and the accused had an opportunity, pretrial, to cross-examine that particular scientist. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Walter Olson
Motel 6 is on the lurid side [Point of Law] Prospect of cyberwar: official U.S. response is commando lawyering [Stewart Baker, Foreign Policy] Why it’s hard to stimulate manufacturing through product liability reform in one state [Rick Esenburg] Tags: attorneys general, free speech in Canada, Iowa, Manhattan Institute, Ohio, product liability, third party liability for crime, whistleblowers Related posts January 2000 archives, part 1 (0) September 2000 archives, part 2… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  It did not grant any additional cases, but asked the U.S. [read post]