Search for: "U.S. v. Ortiz"
Results 261 - 280
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2008, 5:02 pm
Dada's appeal was pending, the Fifth Circuit held in Banda Ortiz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
As the federal courts have observed, a defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the publicly accessible exterior of his or her vehicle, and the undercarriage is part of the vehicle's exterior (see New York v Class, 475 U.S. 106, 112-114 [1986]; United States v Rascon-Ortiz, 994 F2d 749, 754 [10th Cir 1993]; see also People v Jackson, 143 AD2d 471, 472 [1988]). [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 20, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
US v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
See Neely v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:22 am
Michael Ortiz
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:29 am
Castellanos, 2008 U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
The court distinguished Ortiz, finding that the privacy interests in cell phones exceeded those in pagers. 2007 U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 10:23 pm
Carroll, 2008 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:15 am
Carroll, 2008 U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
Class, 475 U.S. 106, 114 (1986); United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 11:26 am
Ortiz, __ M.J. ___, No. 07-0555/AR (C.A.A.F. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:05 am
In so holding, the Court concluded that the Supreme Court’s holding in Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:04 am
Ortiz Bros. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 7:51 am
Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000), and its own precedent governing late direct appeals (State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:08 am
Ortiz Funeral Home Corp. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:53 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeClaims Held in Abeyance so Habeas Corpus Petitioner Can Exhaust Claim Over Supervision in State Court Ortiz v. [read post]