Search for: "U.S. v. Smart*" Results 261 - 280 of 2,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am by Nicole Saharsky
She served for 10 years as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
Background This case began in 2014 when Unwired Planet, a U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:48 am by Florian Mueller
Apple argues that even if it is held in violation of one or more valid Ericsson patents, an exclusion order (i.e., a U.S. import ban) shouldn't issue because the iPhone is indispensable and irreplaceable (those are my words) and without iPhone imports reaching U.S. customers, the sky would fall.Switching costs between iOS and Android are a key part here--and they are in Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:10 pm
(Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at pp. 687, 693-694 [prejudice requires a "reasonable probability" that competent performance would have led to a different result].) [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:18 pm
Here are some of the cases from Update #28:U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:43 am by Florian Mueller
But by avoiding U.S. import bans this way, Google still can't change the fact that Android infringes.Microsoft has been saying for years that Android infringes its patents, and it keeps proving this in court, despite delays particularly in U.S. lawsuits. [read post]