Search for: "U.S. v. Sweet*" Results 261 - 280 of 662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm by Rumpole
 Rumpole practice tip #19: Be aware of Wilson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
The U.S Court of Appeal held that;“Likely…to cause confusion” means more than the likelihood that the public will recall a famous mark on seeing the same mark used by another. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
FBI agents interviewed one of the men soon after Awlaki was killed in a U.S. drone strike in 2011, but he denied any connection with Awlaki. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:02 pm
While perusing the Central District of California's website, I came across the March 26, 2008 decision in Siegel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chong, Team Leader, Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC), U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:10 pm
"  Whatever that might mean.In the U.S., the first sale doctrine (usually referred to elsewhere as "exhaustion of rights") limits the ability of an intellectual property rights owner to control a product once it has been released into the stream of commerce. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Rick St. Hilaire
”  - William ShakespeareThe Bard's poetic coined phrase features prominently in the prosecution's latest pleading filed in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:18 pm by daniel
Fortunately for Nutritionix, the Alice v. [read post]