Search for: "U.S. v. William Miller"
Results 261 - 280
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
If the sponsors lack standing, there is no valid “case” or “controversy” (terms used in Article III of the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
Herman Miller, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:17 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
(The U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Rosales-Garcia, 667 F.3d 1348 (10th Cir. 2012) - Elena Kagan, Williams v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:54 am
Williams, a shareholder at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
It's difficult to quantify the costs that such closed rules impose on businesses and workers, but a recent examination of US job creation demonstrates that they could be significant (h/t Mark Perry): Since the recession ended in June 2009, almost three out of every four jobs added to U.S. payrolls have been in Right to Work states (1.86 million out of 2.59 million), even though those 22 states represent only 38.8% of the U.S. population (120 million). [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 3:46 am
(For a little different take, see U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Miller. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:58 am
Williams, a partner at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]