Search for: "US Dept of Education"
Results 261 - 280
of 885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
[FN1] Thereafter, the LGPC submitted permit applications and supporting materials for the use of ProcellaCOR in both bays. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
[FN1] Thereafter, the LGPC submitted permit applications and supporting materials for the use of ProcellaCOR in both bays. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:09 am
., Second Dept., 273 AD2d 396, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 766The Pell doctrine, typically used to test the reasonableness of a disciplinary penalty, basically states that a disciplinary penalty imposed by a public employer will be sustained unless it is found to be disproportionate to the offense [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d, 222].In the Rapkiewicz and Tiano appeals, the application of the Pell doctrine resulted in the Appellate Division remanding… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
Commissioner of Educ, et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
," New Yorker, 25 May 2022 [text]Reports:The Biden Administration’s Dedicated Docket: Inside Los Angeles’ Accelerated Court Hearings for Families Seeking Asylum (UCLA, May 2022) [text]Fact Sheet: Implementation of the Credible Fear and Asylum Processing Interim Final Rule (US Dept. of Homeland Security, May 2022) [text]- See also related blog post.A Guide to Title 42 Expulsions at the Border (American Immigration Council, updated May 2022) [text]USCIS Records… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
A system of ‘Distance education’ was established alongside the use of regional colleges, in a move to ensure students did not have opportunities to congregate (and thus foment ‘trouble’). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
Bottom Line Dept. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
"Journal articles:"Asylum seekers’ experiences of participatory barriers in the educative pre-integrational programmes," European Educational Research Journal, OnlineFirst, 12 Jan. 2023 [open access]- Focuses on Finland. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of Cayuga, 212 AD2d 963,… [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Legal Defense & Educ. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Legal Defense & Educ. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of Cayuga, 212 AD2d 963,… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:01 pm
There's a very interesting piece by Mike Elgan called "Pre-Crime Comes to the HR Dept. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
Dept. of State, Video:U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
Dept. of Corrections, 86 F.3d 1180 (D.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:41 pm
" A report by the US Dept. of Justice revealed that the student endured more than two years of malicious taunting, inappropriate touching, and having objects hurled at him. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
In any event, video tape evidence must be presented without modification as the decision in Principe v New York City Dept. of Educ. 94 AD3d 431, demonstrates. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:04 am
., 3rd Dept., 296 A.D.2d 805 From time to time disciplinary charges alleging misconduct because the employee's actions discredited the employer in the eyes of the public are filed against an employee. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:38 pm
Question 28: States that if an employee’s work schedule is reduced by the employer, the employee cannot take FFCRA leave to bridge the gap between the employee’s reduced hours and the hours the employee used to work. [read post]
