Search for: "US Steel Corp. v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
From 1986 until November 2006, U.S. law on the subject of non-market economies had been governed by a Court of Appeals decision, Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
  Well, also as predicted, the Obama administration today petitioned (more here) the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - the court responsible for the "bombshell" ruling in GPX Int'l Tire Corp v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm
In the coming days, Congress is expected to consider and pass legislation responding to the ruling of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
This case involved a Mennonite resident whose religion forbade the use of steel cleats on tires of his tractor wheels, which conflicted with a local county ordinance requiring them. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
This case involved a Mennonite resident whose religion forbade the use of steel cleats on tires of his tractor wheels, which conflicted with a local county ordinance requiring them. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Brian A. Comer
Peoples Baking Co., 205 S.C. 149, 31 S.E.2d 154 (1944) (piece of steel in piece of cake); Coward v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:22 pm by Jody Nathan
 Ohio Casualty appealed, and the Tenth Circuit certified the following question to the Utah state courts: Should the defense costs in the Edizone case be allocated between Ohio Casualty and Unigard under the “equal shares” method set forth in the “other insurance clause” of Ohio Casualty’s policy, or, in the alternative, because the policies were issued for successive periods, should those defense costs be allocated using the time-on-risk method… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The United States complained to the WTO about China’s support of wind turbines; the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The United States complained to the WTO about China’s support of wind turbines; the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Kirstin Dvorchak
He also serves as a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, and DIRECTV. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Steel Corp. recently reached an out-of-court settlement with the Canadian Government with respect to allegations that the company had failed to abide by various undertakings provided under the ICA to gain approval of its acquisition of Stelco, the Canadian steelmaker. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm by John J. Burke
  The Federal Circuit agreed with Commerce and established the rule that CVD petitions could not be filed against NMEs in Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply   United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]