Search for: "US v. Casey" Results 261 - 280 of 1,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 16432 (ED CA, Feb. 9, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing without prejudice for failure to exhaust internal remedies the complaints by a Native American inmate regarding lack of religious services, confiscation of his sacred pipe, sweat lodge access, ceremonial tobacco use, and lack of access to a Native American spiritual advisor, as well as retaliation and lack of protection claims.In Casey v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
” Perhaps most significantly, he pointedly notes that “[n]either party has asked us to reassess the constitutional validity” of Casey’s undue burden test, suggesting that Casey and what remains of Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
What used to be a death sentence is now an inconvenience. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:26 am
Casey, could be used to challenge individual decisions made by government concerning health care. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
  Notably, liberal nominees have used the same language about cases like District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220 [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220 [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Casey, a majority of the Supreme Court explained why it was retaining the “essential holding” of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:20 pm
I’m doing some research into the 1986 abortion case of Thornburgh v. [read post]