Search for: "US v. Daniel David" Results 261 - 280 of 991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Boulger v Woods, 2019, No.18-3170, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a libel claim against actor James Wood over a tweet during the 2016 election campaign. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:40 am by Sue Silverman
US Bureau of Land Management, 870 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir., 2017). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
SEC, which involves an attempt by the SEC to use a “scheme liability” theory under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act against an individual who did not “make” the misstatements at issue under Janus v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
This is in keeping with the central purpose of federal campaign finance law, as the US Supreme Court put it in Buckley v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2004.Rudenstine, David. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Trump, EPA, and the Anti-Regulatory State January 24, 2018 | Daniel A. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Daniel Byman offered an analysis of the president’s decision. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Reuters covers the important US Supreme Court case of Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The Siasat Daily has covered the issue of phone hacking and how uses can build an awareness of surveillance. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Attorney General further dilutes the restrictions on the use of force famously established by Public Committee Against Torture v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]