Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 7:26 am
In Davis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:26 am
In Davis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:06 am
The first one was Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Yesterday in Miller v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:14 am
The case is entitled U.S. et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm
United States and Hill v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:14 am
(Davis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:21 pm
See QPSX v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
It was first used by Judge Moore in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:10 pm
Larson (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Four Exceptions in Search of a Theory: District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:04 am
Paul Davis Restoration, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:17 pm
This week the Supreme Court began hearing the oral argument for the case Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
Similarly, with respect to intent, Davis' prior simple possession of drugs was hardly relevant to his intent to distribute, since far more people use drugs than sell them. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
Davis, 2011 U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Four years ago, in Davis v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:01 pm
CEATS v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Susan Davis Van Dyke et al. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:34 pm
In February, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Davis, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:10 pm
The Decision and Order can be found here.The Court determined that under NY Law, the People were required to demonstrate that the particular order to exclude Davis had a legitimate basis and that, considering the nature and use of the subject property, its enforcement did not unlawfully inhibit or circumscribe the defendant from engaging in constitutionally or statutorily protected conduct. [read post]