Search for: "US v. Flowers" Results 261 - 280 of 767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The case is Eteros Technologies USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The self-described “#1 fundraising technology used by conservatives” reported less than $2,700 in operating expenses since January 2019 despite processing over $2.8 billion in earmarked contributions, and $212 million in contribution refunds, during that period, according to the complaint. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by Daniel Nazer
” Patent claims like these are almost surely invalid under the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
 The original action is Interflora, Inc., Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), 22 May 2009. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Flowers, and University of Baltimore School of Law Professor José F. [read post]