Search for: "US v. Hicks"
Results 261 - 280
of 364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
Hicks, or whether this Court acquiesces in the Ninth Circuit’s contrary decision in Water Wheel Camp Recreation Area v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
(Relisted after the May 18, May 25, June 1, June 8 and June 15 conferences) Hicks v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Hicks in 1987 through Florida v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
In one, Hicks v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Although summary dismissals do have precedential value (meaning that they have to be followed), they lose that force “when doctrinal developments indicate otherwise,” as the Court held in Hicks v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
As to the latter, plaintiff contends that she meets the burden articulated by the Second Circuit in Brunner v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 10:18 am
Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 325 (1987), "A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
” The note then goes on to quote the decision of the Court of Appeal in Waterson Hicks v Eliopoulous, 14 November 1995 CA; Costs Law Reports (Core Volume) 363. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
” Hicks Slip op. at 15. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
R (on the application of Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1947 (Admin). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Hicks. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 9:19 am
Murthy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
Hicks (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
Hicks) holding that such an analysis is appropriate only if First Amendment rights are implicated. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
Hicks v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
[1] Hicks v Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, upheld by Federal Court of Canada [2] Adekoyoyode v Halifax [3] This definition was accepted on appeal but the remedy was denied due to a saving provision of the Nova Scotia statute. [4] Callagahan v Ryans Quality Pet Foods [5] MacDonald v Mid-Huron Roofing [6] Miraka v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
The Tennessee Court of appeals recently affirmed a jury’s defense verdict in a rear-end car crash case in Hicks v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 4: Lewis v. [read post]
