Search for: "US v. Lloyd"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Global Reinsurance Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
Permission to serve out of the jurisdiction was set aside and the proceedings stayed.This decision is a useful reminder to insurers for the need to include an unambiguous jurisdiction clause into their policies. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
” The owners of the PA proposed security which contained a sanctions clause (the scheme of the ASG 2 is that it is expected to be used with a plain security in the form of ASG 1). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
Lord Leggatt, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lady Rose made the majority decision. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 126 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 1997) (Kuwaiti business was party to the arbitration); Ministry of Defense of Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 am
The decision in VTB Capital Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 8:33 am
Eighteen Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s of London, 22 U.S Dist. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In the U.S., the report highlights the recent Supreme Court of the United States decision, West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 9:55 am
" (Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed) unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
Medeva Plc and Designers Guild Ltd v. [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 10:57 am
" Hudgens, 424 U.S. at 519 (quoting Lloyd Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
