Search for: "US v. Pickering"
Results 261 - 280
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
Coalition for Economic Equity v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm
Carrigan (Granted )Docket: 10-568Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment subjects state restrictions on voting by elected officials to strict scrutiny, the balancing test of Pickering v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
PierceDocket: 09-1353Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals misinterpreted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:38 am
Since its recognition of the right of public employees to speak on matters of public concern in Pickering v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:52 am
Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983), and Pickering v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
Picker, Of Pirates and Puffy Shirts, Va. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
(The non-picker has no special knowledge.) [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
” The court explained that when the speaker is a government employee, the public employer may restrict speech that “does not relate to matters of public concern as long as the employee’s interest in speaking does not outweigh the government’s interest in prohibiting him or her from doing so” under Pickering v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:46 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, agreed with the school district's position, holding held that the use the right to free speech protected by the First Amendment does not extend to the in-class curricular speech of teachers in primary and secondary schools made “pursuant to” their official duties, citing Garcetti v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
Hecht, 32 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1929)Picker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained this rationale in the nineteenth century case, Rude v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 9:15 am
For more see Looking Ahead to TiVo v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:32 pm
Unless they think they can use you. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
It made him resign his deanship, but he retained his teaching position.In 1968, the Supreme Court held in Pickering v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm
Randy Picker: "Vernor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
The third's a little hard to research, so we'll use a proxy for the allowing of negligence concerns in strict liability, which is whether a plaintiff’s comparative fault/negligence reduces the verdict or at some level becomes a complete defense.Here's what we've found:AlabamaAlabama follows its own peculiar form of strict liability called the “Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
[U.S. v National Treasury Employees Union, 513 US 454].3. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
See Page v. [read post]
