Search for: "US v. Richard Jones" Results 261 - 280 of 497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Judge Leon sides with the government here, and uses the 1983 Supreme Court case Block v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit Court of Appeals that will not regard this case as controlled by Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The number in parens is the number of times I've used the tag. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:49 am by Patrick Cormier
The report contains a useful literature review and related findings, which can save a lot of reading, something most of us will appreciate (see p. 7 of the report). [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
  Tell us about that experience and how this book came about. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Learn more about LGBT rights and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
In Vernon Kay v Reveal, the television and radio presenter Vernon Kay complained through his representatives, Hackford Jones, about the accuracy of an article headlined “Vernon’s still walking on eggshells“, published in Reveal magazine in July 2013. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Part III examines those cases in some detail, as well as Jones[6] and Kyllo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Pa. 2012 Jones, J.). another has more aptly described Pennsylvania products liability law as being “a maze of uncertainty. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  With regards to design defect claims, since approximately 1984, the Pennsylvania courts have used a risk-utility analysis to initially determine, as a matter of law, whether a product may be considered by the jury to be defective. [read post]