Search for: "USA v. Vehicle" Results 261 - 280 of 541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 7:48 am by Conor McEvily
Pelkey, holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt state-law claims relating to the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle, as well as the Court’s cert. grant in Burnside v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Pelkey that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt state-law claims relating to the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
A        Institutional, Doctrinal, and Judicial Vehicles of Legal Diffusion ·         The Society for Comparative Legislation - A Vehicle for Legal Diffusion, David Schorr, Tel Aviv University (Israel) ·         Anglo-American Law in 20th Century Italy: Mario Sarfatti’s Contribution to Comparative Law, Annamaria Monti, University of Bocconi (Italy), … [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
DHL Express (USA), Inc., 12-747 (second relist for both). [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
   This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
All the contributors are important contracts scholars in their own right: David Campbell and John Wightman from the UK, Brian Bix, Jay Feinman, Robert Gordon, Claire Hill, Charles Knapp, Ethan Leib, Deborah Post, Edward Rubin, Carol Sanger, Robert Scott, Gordon Smith, Josh Whitford (with Li-Wen Lin) and William Woodward from the USA. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
[See Gary Strauss, AAA Warns E15 Gasoline Could Cause Car Damage, USA TODAY, November 30, 2012.] [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
The Federal crime of Money Laundering is traditionally understood to be the practice of filtering “dirty” money, or ill-gotten gains, through a series of transactions until the funds are “clean,” or appear to be proceeds from legal activities. [read post]