Search for: "United States Response to the Court's November 20, 2013 Order"
Results 261 - 280
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:13 am
According to federal law, these federal prosecutors are responsible for three things: prosecuting criminal cases filed by the federal government; representing the United States in lawsuits where it is a party (either civil court or criminal court); and collecting debts owed to the United States that administrative agencies have been unable to collect. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:13 am
According to federal law, these federal prosecutors are responsible for three things: prosecuting criminal cases filed by the federal government; representing the United States in lawsuits where it is a party (either civil court or criminal court); and collecting debts owed to the United States that administrative agencies have been unable to collect. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Julio J., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:39 am
Sure, Nazaire is trying to make a point that the decisions of a United States District Judge in one state do not dictate the decisions of a United States District Judge in another state. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
In the March 20, 2013 opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:58 pm
Congress ought to fully inform itself of that trend and make an informed judgment as to whether the United States should abandon this command-centric aspect of the military justice system. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
, Law at the End of the Day, Jan. 7, 2013. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 6:56 pm
The Court found that “in certain respects, the EEOC has been negligent in its discovery obligations, dilatory in cooperating with defense counsel, and somewhat cavalier in its responsibility to the United States District Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2013] CSOH 28 P47/12 OPINION OF LORD DRUMMOND YOUNG in the Petition of Mr William MacReath Petitioner; for Judicial Review of a decision of the Law Society of Scotland Act: Ferguson QC, Watts; Simpson & Marwick, Alt: Lindsay QC; Anderson Strathern LLP (Law Society of Scotland) Alt: Miss C, personally (Interested Party) 20 February 2013 [1] The petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Law Society of Scotland… [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:15 am
United States, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, published November 16, 2012 [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:38 pm
The ability of parents to make decisions about the upbringing of their children is a fundamental right that the United States Supreme Court believes is protected under our federal Constitution. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
In particular, where a person is convicted of an offence and the court imposes a sentence of less than two years, the court may order a conditional sentence (i.e., served in the community), except in certain circumstances. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:21 pm
Norway, Ministry of Finance, Press Release: Observation of Siemens concluded, January 11, 2013. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 1:27 pm
Introduction.Modern human rights can be understood as emerging in its current form from the settlement among the allies for a new world order in 1945.[2]The core premises of this new world order settlement were simple, and they tended to cement trends that had been long in the process of maturation.[3] First, authority over people and things was to be centered in states. [read post]
