Search for: "United States for the use and benefit of Impact Environments, Inc."
Results 261 - 280
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Click Here McWane Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm
" Last September, for example, President Obama said, "I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
The French Conseil d'Etat ordered the State to pay French Internet Access Provider Bouygues Telecom the sum of €26,100 as compensation for costs it had met under so-called 2009 graduated response system overseen by HADOPI, under which a series of warnings are issued by HADOPI to infringers using peer-to-peer networks to unlawfully share protected content. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Specialized Units Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
Friday, June 28, 2019 10:30 a.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host a debate titled, “Should the United States severely restrict Huawei's business? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:29 pm
This issue, if handled in the wrong way, would have a negative effect on our economy, stalling our economic recovery, and would result in critical American job losses with no benefit to the environment. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:28 pm
If successful, there is potential for wide-scale implementation across Canada and the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
These practices are a privately imposed tax on the United States’ economy, which only benefits a small, but determined segment of plaintiffs’ firms. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:43 pm
If senators want to increase the loss of manufacturing jobs in the United States and postpone the resurgence of the American economy, then they should vote for this bill. . . [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
— Toledo Blade, November 26, 2009 Sunoco Inc. has agreed to pay a $32,250 civil fine to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for deficiencies found at its Toledo Refinery during inspections in April, 2008. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:25 pm
Employees are expected to have an intrinsic motivation to perform in these companies, which are often found in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:54 pm
Employees are expected to have an intrinsic motivation to perform in these companies, which are often found in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Tree Top, Inc. uses large quantities of anhydrous ammonia at the plant as a refrigerant. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm
Duties include: (1) Developing strategies and recommendations related to human health and the environment in Indian Country; (2) Working with American Indian Environmental Office (AIEO) Senior Advisors in [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
His claim, however, was largely based on the presence of many non-literal similarities including similarities in characters such as their personalities and interactions, and their environment. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Those cases establish, he explained, that “while the State cannot compel an individual simply to speak the State’s ideological message, it can use its regulatory authority to require a physician to provide truthful, non-misleading information relevant to a patient’s decision to have an abortion, even if that information might also encourage the patient to choose childbirth over abortion. [read post]
