Search for: "United States of America v. Whiting" Results 261 - 280 of 1,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The United States was a permanent arrangement, created by the people as an aggregated whole rather than by the states. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
One Techs., 909 F.3d 780 (5th Cir. 2018); Mirant Corp., 613 F.3d at 584; Petroleum Pipe Americas Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:06 am by Steve Hall
Even for Justice Antonin Scalia, the crassest of the current United States Supreme Court justices, it was a particularly callous piece of writing. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For much of the movement, it’s not just that church and state should be tight partners but also that the United States is and should be a Christian country. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie chronicles the recent maneuvering and “histrionics” over whether “New York City’s altered legal terrain will be enough to erase” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
[Note: this is the third post in a series on the history of the changes which were made by General Convention to the Constitution of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America beginning in 1889 and finalized in 1901. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Professor Nicoletti tells us that the American Supreme Court would never reverse its Texas v, White decision which had ruled that there was no right to secession. [read post]
” Thirteen years after Hatchett and his colleagues released their work, many of America’s governors are counting on findings like these. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:15 am by Elie Mystal
Of course, the White House and Democrats will marshal their legal forces as well, and will “coordinate a state-by-state response to any prospective challenges. [read post]