Search for: "United States v. Anthony Williams" Results 261 - 280 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am by NCC Staff
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
[Brayshaw] now brings this action against Defendants City of Tallahassee and State Attorney William Meggs challenging the constitutionality of Section 843.17. . . . [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm by John Floyd
  The independent source doctrine was recently on display in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
Then in 2010 Roberts sided with another conservative majority, this time helmed by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the Citizens United v. [read post]
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covers the filing for this blog; commentary comes from Helen Knowles, who at MSNBC writes that the petition “suggests that the new session will once again revolve around Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose swing vote was critical last June to extending the right to marry to gay couples across the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by Fred Rocafort
Nine years later, in Williams v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Article I, for example, provided that Clinton “willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States” by “impeding the administration of justice. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]