Search for: "United States v. Articles of Food and Drug" Results 261 - 280 of 506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am by jonathanturley
Notably, the Court did not uphold the compromise struck by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in enjoining some recent changes while continuing to allow the drug to be distributed nationally. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized a rule requiring food manufacturers, processors, and packers to keep detailed records of where certain foods originated and traveled. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
There’s nothing like that for the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, but that didn’t stop him from holding that a non-existent federal statute displaced the laws of all fifty states. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Nevertheless, to this day, homeopathic drugs are treated (as opposed to nutritional supplements) by the FDA under Section 201(g)(1) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
That garden variety claim is preempted by the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which forbids states from imposing any requirement in food labeling that is not "identical" to the federal act. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
  After all, we know more than a few Yankees fans.We’d just like to see a little comity every now and then.That would preferable to the current, absurd situation where, in a prescription drug case in Michigan, or in a punitive damages case involving drugs in New Jersey, the plaintiffs lose under those states’ application of the fraud-on-the-FDA preemption rule of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Indeed, there are literally hundreds of well-accepted off-label uses listed in compendia such as the United States Pharmacopeial Drug Information, and the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information for which federal government programs provide reimbursement notwithstanding their off-label status. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would have declined to add a warning to the allegedly harmful drug’s label, failure-to-warn lawsuits under state law are barred due to a conflict with federal labeling regulations. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
She was directly admitted to the medical/respiratory intensive care unit (MRICU). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
The product of concern was identified to be Sea Port Bay Scallops (Wild Harvest, Raw Frozen) that originated in the Philippines (states “Product of the Philippines” on the box) and were distributed by Koha Oriental Foods. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:07 pm by Elizabeth Penava
Food and Drug Administration approval, they still cannot be legally prescribed because of their status as Schedule I substances, Lamkin contended. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
What followed was a series of articles, involvement by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and further studies to determine the effects of Vioxx, two of which were of significant importance. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
  -- Harvard medical school emeritus professor Lester Grinspoon  estimates that at least $200 million is needed for studies to get a drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm by Michael Grossman
Because Risperdal’s box and accompanying literature warn of these possible damages, they have fulfilled their obligation through the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) to alert the consuming public. [read post]