Search for: "United States v. BUILDING, ETC." Results 261 - 280 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In it, he states: Now, let’s move right onto our next legal target and source of lots of billable hours. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
General Assembly (A/72/162) (the 2017 WG Report) sought to unpacks the concept of access to effective remedies under the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
The Parliament Buildings at Stormont © 2024 Northern Ireland Assembly Commission For the entirety of its existence, Northern Ireland’s relationship within the United Kingdom has dominated its politics, its culture and its people. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
The Parliament Buildings at Stormont © 2024 Northern Ireland Assembly Commission For the entirety of its existence, Northern Ireland’s relationship within the United Kingdom has dominated its politics, its culture and its people. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:48 am
Post by Sherry Colb In my column for this week, I write about the Supreme Court's upcoming case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The service he needs rendered could be out of community building 101. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:02 am by Michael Lowe
   Texas is not unique here:  other state courts have also found that the right thing to do in these situations is to establish liability for business owners who fail to provide reasonable safety precautions for customers, clients, residents, etc. and thereby contribute to the criminal act taking place. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit,… [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 7:06 am by Pete Strom
  STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY COUNCIL FOR RICHLAND COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am by Michael Lowe
  This means understanding how the United States Sentencing Manual works alongside corresponding case precedent (e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:00 am by Ryan Flax
  It is my sincere belief that if you polled patent attorneys in the United States, you’d find that 9 out of 10 feel (or, if they closely followed the Apple case – felt) that design patents were a bit of a joke. [read post]