Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 261 - 280 of 584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
President Obama’s criticism of the Supreme Court’s recent Citizens United decision in Wednesday’s State of the Union address dominated the headlines yesterday and today. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
United States---invokes the notion of the state as educator. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Randy Barnett
For example, the words “equal protection” does not appear as a free standing “equality principle,” but appears in the phrase “equal protection of the law” and this passage is embedded in a larger clause that also refers to the “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” (which no state statute may abridge) and the “due process of the laws” (which no state shall deny when depriving a… [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:45 pm
United States Forest Service, No. 06-15371 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
United States, the Supreme Court read the Constitution as forbidding Congress from “commandeering” a state legislature by obligating it to enact a law. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  He writes, with respect to Randy Barnett’s narrow reading of the commerce power: Koppelman accurately states, "If Barnett's discoveries mean what he thinks they mean, then much of present federal law is unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Barnett, 63 M.J. 388, 394 (C.A.A.F. 2006); United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Barnett, 63 M.J. 388, 394 (C.A.A.F. 2006); United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The allegations, as discussed in United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by JB
Among its many other virtues, the opinions in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]