Search for: "United States v. Blackman" Results 261 - 280 of 852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Part V will consider the meaning of the phrase "Office . . . under the United States," which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm by Josh Blackman
Last year, the January 6 committee requested certain documents from the Archivist of the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am by Dennis Crouch
  The decision was 5-4, with Justice Blackman writing in dissent and arguing that “The Court has opened the way to deny the holder of the United States combination patent the benefits of his invention with respect to sales to foreign purchasers. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:09 am by Josh Blackman
United States, the court has held that the federal government cannot commandeer state policymaking. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Is the President an 'officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, 15 NYU Journal of Law & Liberty 1 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:26 pm by Josh Blackman
 UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,  IT IS ORDERED that the application to issue the judgment forthwith is granted, and the judgment is issued to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am by Josh Blackman
OSHA has instead pretextually redefined what is at this point a hazard of life in the United States and throughout the world—COVID-19—as a hazard of the workplace. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Shortly before the first official case of COVID-19 appeared in the United States, our court decided a case involving a religious objection to another vaccine mandate. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
" Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an "officer of the United States" for purposes of Section 3. [read post]