Search for: "United States v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 261 - 280
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
Judge Kavanaugh’s dissent stressed that federal law expressly allows the State Department to contract with American workers in foreign locations without regard to statutory provisions relating to employment contracts in the United States, including the ADEA. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
Birke v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Hart In California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The Respondent contracts with the United States Marshals Service (USMS) to provide security services at federal courthouses. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/04/09-50113.pdf United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:49 am
The answer is "yes", courtesy of the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in the seminal case of Casias v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.In theory, the 2008 enactment of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (MMMA) provides a statutory right for patients and their caregivers to cultivate and use medical marijuana. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:12 am
Oklahoma State University Board of Regents, No. 08-6249 (August 17, 2009). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The Board found, contrary to the Acting Regional Director, that the petitioned-for unit of the Employer's beverage subdepartment employees does not constitute a separate appropriate unit, and that the smallest appropriate unit must include all employees in the Employer's beverage, catering, and restaurant subdepartments. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
See, e.g., United Hospitals of Newark, 232 NLRB at 443 ('while the Union may attempt to . . . prevent a work stoppage or disruption of services, it cannot control the actions or reactions that the mere presence of a picket line may induce in others.'). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
” Consequently, the Board rejected her claim. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
It would have a hard time saying otherwise, since the government itself petitioned for Supreme Court review on this very issue a couple years back in the much-relisted United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Charges filed by UNITE HERE; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/Sk7 Nat'l Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:40 am
MacLean v. [read post]
