Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 261 - 280 of 3,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Suzanna Sherry
” On the other side, Thomas, Alito, and Breyer expressed concerns about how a ruling in favor of the Cassirers might affect the foreign policy interests of the United States in other cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States, the Court held that if a police officer has probable cause to make an arrest (or reasonable suspicion for a stop), then there is no Fourth Amendment violation, even if the officer's real reason for the arrest (or stop) would not satisfy the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 8:58 am by Suzanna Sherry
The United States has filed an amicus brief in support of Cassirer, adding two primary arguments. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 1:56 pm by Amy Howe
The question, Keller emphasized, is not what the United States is going to do about COVID-19, but instead who is going to decide what to do. [read post]
In 2021, Buntion appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States and asked the Justices to declare his 30 years on death row a cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
As its name suggests, the expropriation exception supplies federal courts with jurisdiction over certain cases concerning property taken by a foreign government: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case . . . in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property or any property exchanged for such property is present in the United… [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Is the President an 'officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, 15 NYU Journal of Law & Liberty 1 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm by Holly Brezee
Asbill  On July 9th, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGirt v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
But we agree with the California court here that hospitals are required to obey state laws giving everyone a right to health care and that decisions about who can receive treatment cannot be made through a religious lens.Controversy 3: The Ministerial Exception: Where Non-believers Are Magically Transformed into “Ministers”Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch joined Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh in expanding the ministerial exception in… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
For example, in 2020 the PTO denied registration to the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts, even though the applicant argued that the mark was “political commentary about presidential candidate and president Donald Trump that the relevant consumer in the United States would not understand to be sponsored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Donald Trump. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm by Howard Friedman
Perhaps nothing at all, says this Court....Houston Public Media reports on the decision.Then in the other challenge to the Texas law, United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
The justices agreed in late October to take up their case along with the Biden administration’s challenge to the law, United States v. [read post]