Search for: "United States v. Chen" Results 261 - 280 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2012, 10:34 pm by Leland E. Beck
FEC Contributor Disclosures:  Chris Rissetto and Carlos Valdvia, and Julius Chen, separately report that the FEC, by a party-line vote, declined to pursue a new rulemaking to amend the electioneering contributor limitations, or campaign donor advertising, regulations struck down in Van Hollen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:01 am by Jim Chen
Jim Chen, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act, downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962: In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:01 am by Jim Chen
Jim Chen, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act, downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962: In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:46 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The federal district court in Manhattan yesterday heard arguments in the matter of United States Of America v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"  That is what the United States Attorneys Office, Southern District of New York, contends in its objection filed yesterday in the case of United States Of America v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:35 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Sets Aside Hazing Related Conviction for Sentence Appropriateness Here is a link to the unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 1:31 pm by Mali Friedman
Judge Chen noted that he found the Leong decision by Judge Feess and the 2011 decision of Judge Henderson of the Northern District of California in Valentine v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm by Robert Milligan
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California examined the principal-agent relationship between the parties to determine what responsibilities each had to the other based on the relationship’s underlying agreements and under California law. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
He also discussed the Third Circuit’s merits opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 2008, that is on point. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Of course, the Supreme Court is not asking the opinion of Raymond Chen (USPTO Solicitor General), but rather the opinion of Solicitor General of the United States (acting on behalf of the US). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
K 1772 C48 2011 Compliance and compromise : the jurisprudence of gender pay equity by Cher Weixia Chen. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]