Search for: "United States v. Clemente" Results 261 - 280 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr Clemente was debarred for procedural failings. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
Want to amaze your friends with your ability to predict the outcome of cases argued in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am by Ronald Mann
The United States files a brief that technically supports neither party, but in practical effect seems to provide considerable benefit to POM. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am by David Kopel
No jurisdiction in the United States has a law like New York City's. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am by Adam Schlossman
  (At ACS blog, Jeffrey Clements disputes Citizens United’s criticism of the Kagan nomination.) [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
I begin with this post, which first appeared here in October 2009, called "The Church, (P)ECUSA and the DFMS", with newly updated links and facts:* * * *I have been asked to explain the difference between "the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America" and the "Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the justices rejected the argument that the structure of the Federal Trade Commission, with five commissioners who could be removed only for cause, was unconstitutional, is an exception to that rule, but he urged the justices not to extend the exception. [read post]