Search for: "United States v. County of Los Angeles" Results 261 - 280 of 822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2018, 2:03 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Drug Enforcement Agency and its director Chuck Rosenberg, and, to top it off, the United States of America. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Matthew Finkin looks at Epic Systems v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that Janus v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:47 am by Cannabis Law Group
The growers association said the counties most vulnerable are Humboldt, Trinity, and Mendocino counties in northern California, home of the Green Triangle, where it is estimated most marijuana in the United States is grown. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles currently handle up to 64% of all West Coast oceanic shipping, and 35% of all such shipping in the United States. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:55 am by James Yang
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:55 am by James Yang
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
Plaintiff brought a putative class action in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles alleging Defendant UFP Riverside, LLC (“Defendant”) engaged in a uniform policy and systematic scheme of wage abuse against their hourly-paid or non-exempt employees. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to help pay for collective bargaining, noting that the case has “enormous financial implications for teachers’ unions. [read post]