Search for: "United States v. Flood" Results 261 - 280 of 1,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm by sgottlieb
As I explained last week, inequality in the United States is making democracy increasingly unsustainable. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Gene Killian
 And after reading about the recent decision by the Second Circuit in Cammeby’s v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Gene Killian
 And after reading about the recent decision by the Second Circuit in Cammeby’s v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Royal Dutch Petroleum – an Alien Tort Statute case involving a violation of the law of nations and whether a corporation can be a defendant in an Alien Tort Statute action;  United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
Case date: 28 June 2022 Case number: No. 19-13285 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 2:07 pm by Allan Blutstein
Army Corps of Eng'rs (D.D.C.) -- finding that: (1) agency did not provide sufficient information to justify its reliance on Exemption 4 to withhold agency’s draft report that included information prepared by the State of Mississippi regarding its proposed flood control project; and (2) agency could not use Exemption 5 to withhold draft report because state agency was not a “quasi-federal” agency nor a consultant. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:10 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States, 193 U.S. 197, 400–401 (1904)(Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
  The state contends that Longoni was relying only on Rast’s notes; Smith contended that he relied on Rast’s report as well as on her notes, and treated them essentially as a unit. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
This claim failed in court — most famously in Flood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Kleist, Immunity for Multilateral Development Banks in the United States: Assessing Litigation Exposure Following the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
United States) that threw everything into flux: My summary op-ed of the issue and my reasons for why Congress should just "do nothing. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:52 pm by Anna McLean and Joy O. Siu
On April 6, 2017, the California Supreme Court struck another blow in its contentious battle with the United States Supreme Court on the enforceability of consumer arbitration clauses subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]