Search for: "United States v. Free" Results 261 - 280 of 17,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm by charley foster
(I've stored it on a free hosting service so it can be slow to open). [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by marcorandazza
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by marcorandazza
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that “sexual orientation discrimination is motivated, at least in part, by sex and is thus a subset of sex discrimination. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:02 pm by Patent Docs
To parties accusing the federal government of infringing their patents, the decision means that they will be free of AIA post-grant challenges from the accused agency. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:02 pm by Patent Docs
To parties accusing the federal government of infringing their patents, the decision means that they will be free of AIA post-grant challenges from the accused agency. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
May (The Free State Foundation) & Andrew Magloughlin (The Free State Foundation) have posted NFIB v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Gonzales is an attempt  to reverse the change of copyright protection in the United States from an opt-in system to an opt-out system brought by the Copyright Renewal Act (CRA) of 1992 and the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA). [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens, a dissenter to the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, June 7, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:01 am
Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the consolidated cases of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:58 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 7715 (TX App., July 21, 2016), a Texas state appeals court affirmed the dismissal of a claim by a Jewish-Druid inmate that insistence he receive an insulin dose at 3:00 am violates his free exercise rights because his religion requires that he not eat or rise before sunrise.In Henderson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is the exclusive representative empowered to negotiate with Illinois about wages, hours and conditions of employment for Janus’ bargaining unit. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Carl Folsom, III and Carol Longenecker Schmidt won in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 11:11 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, December 7, 2015 More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]