Search for: "United States v. Grow" Results 261 - 280 of 4,225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Ilya Somin
We therefore conclude that Section 3241(a) is repugnant to both the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:23 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
.), University of California Press, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4262774 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4262774 – “Reproductive rights in the United States are under threat, and the threat is growing more serious by the day. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:50 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
  That's what Aussies call the natural gas released by fracking, and Aussies are beginning to debate the practice as hotly as we are in the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:54 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit today upheld the use of these statutes in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
About six weeks ago, I blogged about the Army Court of Criminal Appeals' July decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
That the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case of King v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm by WIMS
      The United States, representing the interests of the Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service as amicus curiae, argues that § 9 is ambiguous, that the Appeals Court must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]