Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 261 - 280
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:01 am
Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am
Confidential financial statements, balance sheets, trade secrets, and revenue and cost projections provided to the Department of Rail and Public Transportation, provided such information is exempt under the federal Freedom of Information Act or the federal Interstate Commerce Act or other laws administered by the Surface Transportation Board or the Federal Railroad Administration with respect to data provided in confidence to the Surface Transportation Board and the Federal… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
If a sale is made, the Agent will also collect a 25% “commission. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Exempt Carrier Company which transports commodities exempted from Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) economic regulation. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39027-2.10.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Before O'Meara's resentencing, the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Blakely v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am
” Recall the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
