Search for: "United States v. Jesse" Results 261 - 280 of 645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Amy Howe
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:29 am by Marissa Miller
” At UPI, Michael Kirkland discusses the impact of the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
(Here is audio of the September 9 argument in that campaign spending case, Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]