Search for: "United States v. K" Results 261 - 280 of 3,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by CFM Admin
Although the project is being conducted in a purely experimental fashion using simulated data, the pilot can be seen as one of the first steps taken by a governmental agency towards creating a central bank digital currency.SEC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by CFM Admin
Although the project is being conducted in a purely experimental fashion using simulated data, the pilot can be seen as one of the first steps taken by a governmental agency towards creating a central bank digital currency.SEC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am by Picl Guest Blogger
United Property & Casualty / United Insurance Holdings Corp: $10 million in dividends each year, including $4 million in dividends to CEO United Property and Casualty, the main operating subsidiary of United Insuran [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 5:59 am by Just Security
Parachini The Just Security Podcast: United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 2:17 am by Kurt R. Karst
Download either Form FDA 3602 (for a business headquartered in the United States) or Form FDA 3602A (for a business headquartered outside the United States). [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Post, The Courts on Climate Change and Fundamental Rights Arnon Gutfeld, Cantwell v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm
To further put it succinctly, this mandate was reflected even in the judiciary’s judgment in various cases, most significantly in Chang Liang Sang & Ors v Public Prosecutor [1982] 2 MLJ 231:other than in the most exceptional circumstances, a sentence of death should be imposed following a conviction for trafficking, in order to mark the gravity of the offence, to emphasise public disapproval, to serve as a warning to others, to punish the offender and most of all the protect the… [read post]