Search for: "United States v. Kelly"
Results 261 - 280
of 970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am
This edited volume is part of a collaboration among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
Kelly Chambers, for the State. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
This two-decade trend started in 1999 with United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
United States, finding that licenses were not property; Skilling v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Unsatisfied by her response, Nadler concluded his questioning by rather bluntly stating that the Trump administration will need to offer a more compelling argument to reauthorize the “perhaps useless” CDR program than “maybe someday it’ll do some good. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
During its upcoming term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment finding that Congress properly delegated authority to the U.S. attorney general to apply the registration requirements of a sex-offender-registration law, “may presage a coming sea change in judicial review of agency rules implementing broad Congressional directives. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:32 pm
An employer has the option to unilaterally withdraw recognition from a union that has lost support of a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit as held in the Supreme Court’s decision in Allentown Mack Sales & Service v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
In the example of a 50 year old teacher who would have worked until the age of 65, who earning $60,000/year, a Court can quantify the past and future income loss for the family unit. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am
One of the INA’s mandatory bars denies asylum to a foreign national who en route to the United States passes through a country with which the United States has a safe third country agreement. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
The court determined that the United States was TCG’s habitual residence on that date because the last shared intent of Carvajal and Gamba was that TCG live in the United States. [read post]
