Search for: "United States v. Key" Results 261 - 280 of 10,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm by Guest Author
Now they see reversing Chevron as key weapon in their battle to enfeeble “the administrative state. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:33 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Their expertise is grounded in a deep understanding of the First Amendment, which plays a central role in libel law in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
       ALEC also has taken strides in coopting progressives seeking an Article V convention to reverse Citizens United. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am by Holly
The outcome will likely have a lasting impact on the strategic considerations of parties engaged in or contemplating arbitration, reinforcing or reshaping the dynamics of dispute resolution in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
Bills restricting the use of noncompete provisions are also pending in other states, including Iowa, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
The United States appears poised to heed that call with the small fraction of Russian frozen assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]