Search for: "United States v. National City Lines" Results 261 - 280 of 1,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 2:03 pm by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
United States gave a memorable example, timely in 2016: If a baseball manager told a scout “to find a defensive catcher, a quick-footed shortstop, or a pitcher from last year’s World Champion Kansas City Royals,” the scout wouldn’t think the catcher and shortstop needed to be on the championship roster. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Nelson Tebbe
By Netta Barak-Corren and Nelson TebbeOn November 4, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am by Patrick T. Ryan
Under the negotiation class approach, a class is identified—here it was all 34,458 cities and counties in the United States—and potential class members are asked upfront if they would like to opt out of the class. [read post]
Instead, in the United States, those questions are presented first and foremost to the states for resolution—and that makes them the first line of defense in preventing an electoral dispute from becoming a full-fledged constitutional crisis. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am by Adam Feldman
The prominence of criminal law is evident from the high placement of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, which filed amicus briefs in more state cases during this period than any group other than the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am by Elena Chachko
The United States currently has more than 35 national emergencies in force—all triggering the broad IEEPA sanctions authorities. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Judge Reeves assumes that whether an officer's physical intrusion into a car is reasonable is governed by a Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
But he was also an agnostic who lived in a city where zealous Calvinism had morphed into a more liberal Unitarianism. [read post]