Search for: "United States v. Ohio Power Co."
Results 261 - 280
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
See, e.g., Florida Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Ex parte order based on misleading information: Franz Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co, KG v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm
The prohibition was acknowledged to be the broadest in the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Indeed, the United States attempted and failed to make such a showing in Grupo Mexicano. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Introduction. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am
United States, the government notes the “public interest” in a jury trial. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Einer Elhauge, has stated: “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am
Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308, 311, 316 (1980) (preliminary injunctions against the showing of films “that have not been finally adjudicated to be obscene” are generally unconstitutional prior restraints); Auburn Police Union v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
------- Title: NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Ohio, Alabama, Iowa, and Oklahoma announced similar bans.The impact of these bans is self-evident. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
