Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 261 - 280 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by Blake Marcus
History As the United States developed a more intricate highway system in the 1960s and 1970s, the automobile became increasingly more important. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
I have stated many times that as a comprehensive theory, originalism is largely an American product and remains a minority position even in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:17 pm by Amy Howe
Postal Service after the United States declined to do so, the Court is unlikely to adopt the reasoning of the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
They also explored how the United States can strike a “balance between privacy, security and the economic imperatives driving innovation” among other topics. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:11 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
United States, one might quarrel over whether an annually-imposed levy on consumer-owned carriages was direct or indirect. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:26 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The EEOC has repeatedly stated its intention to continue to litigate background check cases despite its initial string of embarrassing losses on this issue. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:24 am by Jack Goldsmith
”  The IAEA side deals with Iran are not ones that include the United States or that commit it to take action. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:42 pm
See In re United States, No. 14–70486, 2015 WL 3938190, at *8 (9th Cir. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:21 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Second Circuit asks when that one year clock begins to run.The case is Rosa v. [read post]