Search for: "United States v. Page"
Results 261 - 280
of 8,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
United States (06-11429) on what qualifies as a “felony drug offense” for federal sentencing purposes, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:31 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm
Office of Personnel Management, Judge Vanessa Bryant of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut found Section 3 of DOMA to violate equal protection. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 4:26 am
The site highlights Marshall's civil rightsactivities (including a page devoted to Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 6:48 pm
By a 2-1 vote tonight, in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Mich.): Plaintiff alleges that Ballotpedia "has withdrew the 'Bryan Trouten for United States House of Representatives Campaign' on their website. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
Vesely v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
SEB:A recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in a patent lawsuit may, somewhat surprisingly, have a major and destructive impact on federal criminal law. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court has decided Kansas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
United States, reversing and remanding Mr. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme… [read post]
