Search for: "United States v. Price, Jr."
Results 261 - 280
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
O'Connell, Jr., who handled the Hood murder trial. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The case is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:44 pm
Many overseas internet gambling sites have blocked access to the United States, while others have not. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
Loree Jr. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Standard alleged a multi-year antitrust conspiracy to enhance price levels by the coordinated reduction of industry output of steel products in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:59 pm
V. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
Hibner, Jr [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
Did the agency evaluate your cost/price based on the technical solution you actually proposed? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
GUY, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
O'Brien, Jr. and Magistrate Jeanne L. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:22 pm
In the instant case, it would seem that reasonably prudent persons in the position of the defendants would see that their actions setting prices in the United States would negatively affect customers in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
In the ten years following the 1982 outbreak, approximately thirty E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks were recorded in the United States (Griffin & Tauxe, 1991). [read post]
