Search for: "United States v. Register"
Results 261 - 280
of 6,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Circuit Court concluded that the audit was within the scope of the Fund trustees’ authority under the Supreme Court’s decision inCentral States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Circuit Court concluded that the audit was within the scope of the Fund trustees’ authority under the Supreme Court’s decision inCentral States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
States. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:35 pm
US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:35 pm
US v. [read post]
Cohen v Cohen, 2016 WL 4546980 (E.D. Missouri, 2016) [israel] [Habitual Residence] [Petition denied]
16 Sep 2016, 9:31 am
The Mother was a citizen of both the United States and Israel. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) [final guidelines, PDF] does not require pre-act offenders to register before the attorney general validly specifies that the act's registration provisions apply to them. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:49 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder, JURIST report] that the failure to register provision [18 USC § 2250] of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) does not apply retroactively to offenses occurring before SORNA's enactment. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:30 am
Norfolk Southern Railway in which the United States Supreme Court addressed the validity of Pennsylvania's consent by registration statute. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:32 am
Case date: 24 January 2023 Case number: No. 21-1823 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:30 pm
Mesriani and Associates, PC, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 16-55958, 02 May 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
