Search for: "United States v. Rose" Results 261 - 280 of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 3:33 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
., a nationwide operator of charter schools, will pay $570,000 to settle a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit filed by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Such petitions are subject to dismissal, see Rose v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by cdw
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
" Rose also noted that same-sex couples can now marry in Massachusetts and Connecticut, implying that use of the term "marriage" to refer to a legally-united same-sex couple is becoming an accepted part of the definition of the word "marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by Benjamin Goh
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
The cross, which local organizations erected to honor 49 local soldiers killed in World War I, rose to fame (or infamy depending on your view) when a group of local residents filed a 2012 lawsuit in federal court in which they argued that the cross violates the United States Constitution’s “establishment clause. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
The cross, which local organizations erected to honor 49 local soldiers killed in World War I, rose to fame (or infamy depending on your view) when a group of local residents filed a 2012 lawsuit in federal court in which they argued that the cross violates the United States Constitution’s “establishment clause. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
The cross, which local organizations erected to honor 49 local soldiers killed in World War I, rose to fame (or infamy depending on your view) when a group of local residents filed a 2012 lawsuit in federal court in which they argued that the cross violates the United States Constitution’s “establishment clause. [read post]