Search for: "United States v. State of NY" Results 261 - 280 of 2,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:15 am by S2KM Limited
Furman prior to the voluntary dismissal of the ELNY class action lawsuit, shortfall payee attorney Roger Christensen quoted from the 1964 United States Supreme Court decision in Donovan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
" The German Court concluded that, had Gabriela not "returned voluntarily with the child to the United States, an order would have been enacted to effect the surrender of the child... for the immediate return purpose of the child to New York, NY, United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
Withdrawing from membership in a New York State public retirement systemRichardson v NYC Employees’ Retirement System, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Gammerman, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]A member of a public retirement system may lose his or her eligibility for significant benefits if he or she decides to withdraw his or her contributions upon leaving public employment. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am by Patricia Salkin
Wooster v Queen City Landing, LLC 2017 WL 1822611 (NYAD 4 Dept. 5/5/017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:26 am by Michael Lumer
The cases are proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but ought to be airing on the Bravo network. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by Howard Friedman
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923); and would hamper and inhibit the educational system that is central to Petitioners’ way of life, raising issues similar, and relevantly indistinguishable, to those addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Wisconsin v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
The provision, passed in 1992, allows “[a]ny national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs” to sue and recover threefold damages in “any appropriate district court of the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:31 pm
Joseph Hosp. of Cheektowaga v Novello, 2007 NY Slip Op 06090 followed suit and rejected constitutional challenges by St. [read post]