Search for: "United States v. Williamson" Results 261 - 280 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolfe reports that the court “appeared likely to side with the Trump administration in its effort to end a program that lets nearly 700,000 young, undocumented immigrants live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am by Nick Basciano
United States, John posted the comments of Edwin Williamson, former Department of State Legal Adviser in the George H.W. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:47 am by Mavrick Law Firm
As the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained in Furmanite Am., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Instead, the Court granted five more than I predicted (Sossamon, Williamson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
” On Tuesday, Wells highlighted opinions from the federal District of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 864 (1989) (describing "settled policy to avoid an interpretation of a federal statute that engenders constitutional issues if a reasonable alternative interpretation poses no constitutional question"); Ashwander v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
However, the Archivist of the United States certified the amendment as ratified under Article V of the Constitution, and published it in the federal register. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
  The Wall Street Journal also has a discussion of the Court's decision to request the government’s views in three other cases: Williamson v. [read post]