Search for: "Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
5 - David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog looks at the GOP's health reform plan. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
What United States Supreme Court decisions actually get the most action in legal circles? [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
Last Act: 04/27/09 REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIESS4872
FOLEY -- Provides procedures for resolution of disputes between a public employer and Suffolk county probation officers Same as A 7171-A BLURB : Civ Serv. res ds Sflk Cty pk polLast Act: 04/27/09 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONSS4890
NOZZOLIO -- Provides for binding arbitration for security services collective bargaining unit members who are warrant and transfer officers in the division of… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Horkley Self-Serve, Inc., No. 08-35063 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Dillard's Inc., No. 08-12824 (11th Cir. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
R.R., Inc., No. 07-2512 (6th Cir. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Osram Sylvania, Inc.2nd Cir.Comparators In Employment Discrimination Case Must Be SimilarBillue v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Rowan University 5th Cir. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's… [read post]
