Search for: "V Cox" Results 261 - 280 of 1,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
shown (apparently only in passing; I haven’t watched yet) in the background of a movie that not only flopped but did so 8 years ago” [Zahr Said on coverage by Kyle Jahner, Bloomberg Law] Jury awards $1 billion to music labels against cable and internet giant Cox, after claims it didn’t do enough to combat infringement by its users [Chris Eggertsen, Billboard] “Newspaper Can Talk About ‘Derby Pies’ Without Infringing Trademarks–Rupp v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:53 am by Tessa Shepperson
  David Cox, Chief Executive, ARLA Propertymark saying Rent controls do not work; it hits hardest those its designed to help the most, and the Mayor of London has failed to learn the lessons of history. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Fighting words, which are restricted because of a danger that they can provoke criminal retaliation, have also at times been folded within this doctrine: Cox v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:34 am by CMS
In this case comment, Michael Cox of CMS comments on the judgment handed down in the matter of The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) [2019] UKSC 46. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:54 pm by R. Clark Morrison and Scott Birkey
  Cox Castle was heavily involved in negotiations over the provisions of the State’s new program. [read post]