Search for: "V. v. Health Care Service Corporation"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Around September 2007, state health inspectors evaluated UTSW's dialysis clinic and criticized the facility because some ceramic floor tiles had come loose from the concrete slab and moisture could be seen under the tiles. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:06 pm
R v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2016 SKPC 2 (CanLII) [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
Both defendants contested the jurisdiction of the English courts and SPDC applied to have the service of the claim form out of the jurisdiction set aside. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:43 am
Ormsby v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
R (Gujra) v Crown Prosecution Service, heard 4 October 2012. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
This is particularly important in highly regulated industries such as health care where patient information is strictly protected. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:50 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, docket 13-567), seeking protection for two related business firms in Ohio. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:02 am
Corp. v New York State Commn. of Correction, 2012 NY Slip Op 03571, Court of Appeals The New York State Commission of Corrections, on behalf of its Medical Review Board, served a subpoena duces tecum on Elmhurst Hospital, a health care facility operated by the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), seeking its records concerning its care and treatment of a deceased correctional inmate in the custody of the City of New York. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am
He then relied on several well-known English cases to derive basic principles for the imposition of such duty of care on the parent company: (1) The three-part test of foreseeability, proximity and reasonableness set out in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman constitutes a starting point of the analysis; 2) A duty of care may be owed, in appropriate circumstances, to the employees of the parent company and those directly affected by the subsidiary’s operations; 3) Such a… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:24 am
USA v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 12:31 pm
" New York Education Law § 6530(19). 11 NYCRR § 65-3.16 (a)(12) states:A provider of health care services is not eligible for reimbursement under section 5102(a)(1) of the Insurance Law if the provider fails to meet any applicable New York State or local licensing requirement necessary to perform such service in New York or meet any applicable licensing requirement necessary to perform such service in any other state in which… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:14 am
Aetna, Anthem Blue Cross, Health Care Service Corporation and others all claim that they have dramatically reduced the number of denials, and those claims that are denied are ostensibly denied because of patient eligibility issues.In real world terms, however, that means that insurers are finding that more and more people are simply "not eligible. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:02 pm
., Petitioners, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:51 am
Second, in June Medical Services v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
